1. Home
  2. iSQI
  3. CTFL-AT exam

iSQI CTFL-AT Exam Prep Course (Premium File)
AI-Powered ISTQB Certified Tester - Agile Tester Exam - Pass on Your First Try

Last updated on Jun 19, 2026

CTFL-AT Practice Exam
Professionally Developed, Always Up-To-Date
CTFL-AT Package
Premium File (PDF): 80 Questions
Interactive Software: Included
AI Teaching Assistant: Included
Duration & Delievery: Self Paced
Last Updated: 19-Jun-2026
Free Updates: 60 Days
Price   Buy 1 Get 1 Free  USD $68
Download Now

Prepare with confidence using our CTFL-AT Exam Simulation App

All ISTQB Certified Tester - Agile Tester certification learning material, study guide, training courses are created by a team of iSQI training experts. The Study Guide and .EXM training software files contain relevant ISTQB Certified Tester - Agile Tester content, labs, practice questions and explanation. This CTFL-AT exam guide and training courses is based on the latest exam outlines available!

Xengine Exam Simulator Software
See how much you’ve learned using Exam Score Report!
Prepare for the real exam using Xengine Software
Customize your test in Xengine Software
Have all of your exams in one place!
Add EXM files to your Xengine Course Library

AI Teaching Assistant Included with this Package

Struggling with a complex question? Just ask your CTFL-AT AI tutor. It explains concepts, clarifies why wrong answers are wrong, and helps you understand CTFL-AT topics in depth, available 24/7, included at no extra cost.

Instant Explanations

Don't just see the right answer, understand why it's right and why the others are wrong. In any Language!

Study Any Time, Any Place

Your AI tutor is available around the clock. No scheduling, no waiting — help is one click away inside the practice test.

Built Into Each Exam

Available directly in your online practice session. Click "Ask AI" on any question and get an instant explanation.

1. Buy the Package

One-time payment, instant access

2. Open a Practice Test

Launch the exam online

3. Click "Ask AI" on Any Question

Get an instant explanation

ISTQB Certified Tester - Agile Tester Study package designed to help you confidently pass your exam.

The CTFL-AT Exam Prep Features:

  • Contains the most relevant and up to date CTFL-AT study material covering all exam topics on the latest CTFL-AT certification.
  • A 90+% historical success rate, giving you confidence in your CTFL-AT exam preparation.
  • Includes a FREE CTFL-AT Mock exam software for added practice.
  • Free updates for 60 days, ensuring you have the latest CTFL-AT study content.
  • Instant access to download the study material, no waiting required.
  • Unlimited download access from any device, making studying convenient and easy.
  • Secure and real-time processing of payments through a 256-bit SSL system.
  • A responsive technical support team to provide you support 24/7.

Take the first step towards passing your CTFL-AT exam with ease by investing in our comprehensive certification exam material.

Preparing and Passing the iSQI CTFL-AT Exam: A Comprehensive Guide

Are you a student aspiring to enhance your career prospects in the software testing field? Look no further! The iSQI Certified Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester (CTFL-AT) exam is a valuable certification that can significantly boost your professional credentials. In this article, we will provide you with all the essential information about the CTFL-AT exam and offer actionable tips to help you prepare and pass with flying colors.

About the CTFL-AT Exam

The CTFL-AT exam is designed by the International Software Quality Institute (iSQI) to validate your knowledge and skills in Agile testing methodologies. It is an internationally recognized certification that demonstrates your proficiency in applying Agile principles and techniques within the software testing domain.

Exam Format

The CTFL-AT exam consists of multiple-choice questions that assess your understanding of Agile testing concepts. The exam duration is 75 minutes, and you will need to answer a set number of questions within this time frame. The passing score for the exam is 65%.

Prerequisites

There are no specific prerequisites for taking the CTFL-AT exam. However, having a basic understanding of Agile methodologies and software testing principles will be beneficial in comprehending the exam content more effectively.

Preparing for the CTFL-AT Exam

Effective preparation is the key to success in any exam. Here are some actionable tips to help you prepare for the CTFL-AT exam:

  1. Understand Agile Testing Concepts: Familiarize yourself with Agile testing methodologies, including Agile principles, values, and practices. Understand the role of testers in Agile projects and the importance of early and continuous feedback.
  2. Study the Syllabus: The iSQI provides a detailed syllabus for the CTFL-AT exam. Review the syllabus thoroughly and ensure you have a solid grasp of each topic covered.
  3. Utilize Recommended Resources: iSQI offers various resources, including study guides, practice exams, and reference materials. Make use of these resources to deepen your understanding and practice your knowledge.
  4. Join Study Groups or Forums: Engage with fellow students or professionals preparing for the CTFL-AT exam. Participate in study groups or online forums to exchange ideas, discuss concepts, and clarify doubts.
  5. Hands-on Experience: Gain practical experience in Agile testing by working on real-world projects or engaging in test exercises. Apply Agile principles and techniques in different scenarios to strengthen your practical understanding.
  6. Practice Sample Questions: Solve practice questions and sample exams to familiarize yourself with the exam format and assess your knowledge. Analyze your answers to identify areas of improvement.
  7. Time Management: During the exam, time management is crucial. Practice answering questions within the allocated time to ensure you can complete the exam comfortably.

Booking and Taking the Exam

To book the CTFL-AT exam, visit the iSQI official website and follow the registration process. Ensure you select a suitable exam center and schedule that aligns with your availability. On the exam day, arrive early, bring your identification documents, and maintain a calm and focused mindset.

Conclusion

The iSQI CTFL-AT exam is an excellent opportunity for students to demonstrate their proficiency in Agile testing methodologies. By following the tips provided in this guide, you can effectively prepare and increase your chances of passing the exam. Remember to study diligently, practice regularly, and maintain a positive mindset. Good luck on your CTFL-AT journey!

iSQI

Recent testimonials from our customers:

sara

how i can get the free update ? after i purchased the exam

Doha, Qatar

VirtuLearn AI

Question 40:
The correct options are Threat detection (B) and Data protection (C).

  • Threat detection: Regulatory compliance often requires monitoring and detecting security threats. Having threat detection capabilities supports incident response, auditing, and risk management that compliance frameworks mandate.

  • Data protection: Compliance heavily focuses on protecting sensitive data (encryption, access controls, data handling, and auditing). Data protection directly demonstrates adherence to privacy and security requirements.

Why not Auto scaling inference endpoints? Auto scaling is about performance and availability, not a regulatory control. It helps handle load but doesn’t by itself show compliance with security or privacy requirements. Similarly, loosely coupled microservices is an architectural pattern; while beneficial, it’s not a direct regulatory compliance capability.

Troy, United States

VirtuLearn AI

Question 248:

  • Correct answer: SOAR

  • Why: A SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) platform is built to pull together alerts from multiple tools (like IDS, firewalls, and DLP), run automated playbooks, and coordinate responses across the environment. This directly reduces mean time to detect and respond.

  • How it differs from the other options:
- CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platform): protects and monitors cloud workloads, not primarily about integrating on-prem security tools. - XCCDF: a framework for security checklists and benchmarks, not for incident orchestration. - CMDB: maintains an asset inventory and relationships; useful for understanding infrastructure but not for automated response coordination.
  • Quick example: On an IDS alert of a potential breach, the SOAR workflow could automatically validate the alert, block offending IP, isolate the host, and open a ticket with a runbook for containment and forensics.

Westminster, United States

VirtuLearn AI

Question 245:

  • Correct answer: D.

  • Explanation:
- The move to a lattice-based cryptographic technique targets post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Lattice-based schemes (e.g., LWE, Ring-LWE) are leading candidates because they are believed to resist quantum attacks, addressing long-term security needs. - Option A overstates perfect forward secrecy as a unique benefit of lattice-based methods. Option B incorrectly emphasizes brute-force resistance vs ECC rather than quantum resistance. Option C mentions ephemeral key exchange and signatures, which are not unique to lattice-based PQC. Option E describes homomorphic processing, not a primary motivation for switching to PQC.
  • Key concept: Replacing ECC with lattice-based crypto is about ensuring security against quantum adversaries and future-proofing cryptographic agility, not about traditional classical performance or other features.

Westminster, United States

VirtuLearn AI

Question 211:

  • Answer: C — The codebase lacks traceability to functional and non-functional requirements.

  • Why this supports formal methods: Formal methods use rigorous, mathematically-based verification to prove that software meets its specified goals. If the codebase cannot be traced back to its functional and non-functional requirements, there’s no solid ground to apply formal proofs or verification. Traceability ensures each component, requirement, and test can be linked and verified, which is essential for formal verification efforts in safety-critical avionics.

  • Why the other options are less direct:
- BOM missing libraries: relates to supply chain and security, not the correctness guarantees formal methods provide. - Lacking dynamic/interactive testing standards: about testing practices, not the formal verification of requirements. - Inefficient memory/resource management: performance issue, not directly about proving correctness against requirements.
  • Takeaway: In safety-critical systems, aligning code with explicit requirements via traceability is a prerequisite for applying formal methods effectively. This helps establish verifiable correctness and safety properties.

Westminster, United States

VirtuLearn AI

Question 206:
Answer: STRIDE

  • STRIDE is a threat-modeling framework that organizes threats into six categories: Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, and Elevation of Privilege.
  • The CISO’s concerns map directly to STRIDE:
- Denial of Service ? high availability (99.999% uptime) - Information Disclosure ? ensuring users only view data they’re authorized to see
  • Why not the others:
- CAPEC catalogs attack patterns, not a threat-modeling framework for system-level threats. - ATT&CK is a knowledge base of attacker techniques, not a formal threat-modeling framework. - TAXII is a threat intel exchange protocol, not used for threat modeling.
So STRIDE directly addresses the CISO’s availability and data-access concerns.

Westminster, United States

VirtuLearn AI

Question 192:

  • Answer: B — The samples were probably written by the same developer.

  • Why this is correct:
- The code shows consistent naming conventions and coding style across both samples (e.g., knockEmDown, sendC2, toString(), address.keepAlive("paranoid"), target.toShell(e)). - Such stylistic similarities strongly suggest a common author or shared template, which is a common basis for attributing malware to the same developer.
  • Why the other options are less likely:
- A: Telemetry buffering mode isn’t shown or established as the key indicator for authorship. - C: Use of IP connectivity for C2 could be common across malware families; it doesn’t imply authorship. - D: inferring which sample is the target agent vs. C2 server isn’t supported by the observable similarities.

Westminster, United States

James

Cannot open my exm file

Boksburg, South Africa

VirtuLearn AI

Question 8:

  • Answer: No. The solution does not meet the goal.

  • Why:
- For an Azure Internal Load Balancer (ILB) used as a listener for a SQL Server Always On availability group, the health probe must be a TCP probe on the port used by the AG listener (default is port 1433, or the port you configured). - An HTTP health probe cannot reliably validate SQL Server endpoints, so it won’t correctly reflect the health of the AG listener.
  • What to configure instead:
- Create an ILB with a backend pool that includes the VMs hosting the AG replicas. - Create a TCP health probe on port 1433 (or the actual listener port). - Create a load-balancing rule for the AG listener port to route to the backend pool.
  • Key concept: ILB health probes must align with the service being load-balanced. SQL Server endpoints require TCP checks, not HTTP checks.

Boksburg, South Africa

VirtuLearn AI

Question 108:

  • Correct answer: A

  • Why: A flat internal cloud network means all hosts can reach each other and any public-facing storage may be exposed. Implementing segmentation with ACLs restricts which networks/hosts can access sensitive file storage, reducing exposure and limiting blast radius.

  • Why not the others:
- B (logging/monitoring to SIEM) helps detect issues but doesn’t prevent exposure caused by a flat network. - C (MFA for cloud storage) improves authentication but doesn't address insecure network access to storage. - D (IDS) detects threats after they occur and doesn’t restrict access to the sensitive locations.

Lagos, Nigeria